High Technology and Human Development

Certain basic assumptions - typically created by leaders and then endorsed by the leaders - can sway their collective consciousness of those leaders insofar as they encourage a willed growth. The result is typically more advanced, but is not necessarily civilized. The assumptions are: "Our level of technological progress is unmatched. When we get to this point it is also necessary prepared our nation for the coming of peace and in order to ensure peace, technology needs to be updated to promote the doctrine of war." Technology advancement that is driven into this direction set the stage for other countries that fear the risk to their sovereignty. It is also encouraged to develop an army technology.  reviews on InventHelp

In the world of civilisation, this kind of development is not laudable and is not morally justified. Because it isn't morally justified, it is irresponsible to society. A look at the premises will show that it is the final one that causes a problem. The third precept is the conclusion of two premises that preceded it, however it is in no way deduced logically. What it reveals is an impulsively deduced conclusion and as such it is not considered a conclusion derived from a rationally-prepared mind at least at the moment it was determined.

A society that progresses by assuming the preceding assumptions particularly in accordance with the absurd conclusion that has transmitted the mentality of unquestionable superiority over its own people. Through all of it, the power of passion is the driving force of human behavior. When it comes to constructive engagements or willed relationships the principle of equality is not working precisely due to the superiority phobia that is a part of the leader and those who lead. And a society that is not willing to take part in the collective ethos or the passions of that society has, according to the accepted logic, turned into an actual or potential enemy and is in danger of being a target in all the possible ways.

Much of what we know about the world today, in the course of media, is driven by the latest technology. The societies that are the most advanced of this technology are often said as being the most technological. It's not just the advancement of technology that elevates them to the heights of strength, power and the spotlight. Technology can also be used to streamline and advance in understanding the world and nature in a new direction, one that is able to remove, as far as is possible, the previous connection between the two which was in most ways dangerous and mystical. This doesn't necessarily mean that technological progress is an indicator of a more advanced civilization.

What we must know is that technology and civilization are not synonymous terms. Civilized people could have advanced technology, or not be able to access it. Civilization is not only something that is a result of technology and science or technological infrastructure, or yet again, the wonder of the built environment. It is also a matter of the mental and moral reticences of individuals as well as their social ties within their society and beyond. It is based on the general human behavior that all kinds of physical structures are created as well as the issue about science and technological advancement. So, the types of roads, bridges, structures, heavy machinery, among other things, we observe in a community could reveal how, generally how people behave. people. A pattern of behaviour could tell how much to which nature is used for infrastructure, science and technology. In addition, the behavioural patterns can reveal a lot about the attitudes and beliefs of people regarding the other.

I believe - and thinkthat most people believe that, when you accelerate the pace of construction and the advancement of technology, the world will shrink back to its naturalness. When technology (and the structures that accompany it or concepts) is competing with the natural ecosystem for the space available, this ecosystem which houses grass, trees flowers, and all sorts of fish and animals is bound been shrinking in size. However, the growing populations, the constant need for quality of life, and the desire to regulate life, without relying on the unpredictability of the natural ecosystem, make it necessary to use technology. Technology shouldn't pose a an unwarranted risk to the natural environment. It is the improper use of technology that's at issue. While a society can legitimately make use of technology to enhance the living standards however, they also need to think: "how much technology do need to be utilizing to protect nature?" If the society Y mixes the moderate use of technology and the natural environment to counteract the destructive destruction of the former This kind of arrangement suggests the fact that Y is a defender of the concept of equilibrium. In light of this we can confidently draw the conclusion that society Y prefers stability over chaos and therefore, an understanding of moral and social accountability. The latest technology indicates the advanced nature of human minds and suggests that the natural world is being tamed with a shrewd hand.

If human beings do not wish to be in a state of limbo with the natural environment , which, naturally is an unpredictability of life , however, according to their own expected speed, then the application of technology is an element of course. It appears that the concept of balance the millennial generation has decided to follow is only temporary or it could be an illusion rather instead of a true one. Since when the human mind is satisfied upon a major technological breakthrough, the tendency to retreat or, at the very least, a slowdown is not common. It's like your mind tells itselfthat "technological progress must be accelerated without a single obstacle. Refraining or slowing down the process is a slap to the mind of an interested one." This type of thinking is merely a way to reveal the mystery of the mind and its dark side, and not its best field. When it comes to examining the way in which we use the technology that is based on the directives from the brain, the importance of ethics is essential.   InventHelp reviews

Does it make sense to make use of this technology to create this type of product? Is it ethically acceptable to make use of this type of product? Both questions indicate that the item or product of concern are either hazardous or not, environmental safe or not, and that they don't just cause harm to human beings directly but directly to the natural environment as well. As I've stated that the goal for technology is enhance living conditions using technology to make products that harm humans as well as the natural environment is a violation of the objective of technology as well as shatters the belief of rationality in humans. In addition it implies that the advanced level humans have reached is not able to comprehend the essence of high-quality life. In this way peaceful and harmonious coexistence with nature surroundings would have been abandoned to satisfy an unhindered, inquisitive human mind. The human mind could be, in a sense, be influenced by notions or beliefs that are incompatible by any means.

The arguments made by environmentalists is based on the issue of environmental degradation and its negative impact for humans. They claim they have no reason for the production of high-tech goods that are harmful to humans as well as the natural world. The argument is convincing. Technology may be a sign of human achievement at its finest however, it does not indicate moral or social accountability. To this end it is asking: "In what ways can humans bridge the gap between unrestrained technology as well as environmental destruction?"

A lot of people of today believe that a sophisticated life is superior to a basic one. The former is bolstered through the power of modern technology, the latter generally not. The former lessens the burden of relying too heavily on the rules of nature however the latter doesn't. The latter is more inclined to have an symbiotic relationship with natural world, while the one is not. The question of whether human comfort comes mostly from advanced technology or from the natural world is not a question that can be resolved. If the natural world is shrinking due to the increase in population and other inevitable causes the need for advanced technology is to reduce the strains on our comfort. It is the unresponsible growth of high-tech weapons, war technology and other products which are in need of criticism and should be stopped.